Corporate Information Security: Is Our Information More Secure Since September 11th?

One might think that years after September 11th, 2001access to information and analysis relating to
there would be dramatic differences andinformation provided by other members and obtained
improvements in the way businesses strive to protectfrom other sources, such as US Government, law
their employees, assets, and data. However, changesenforcement agencies, technology providers and
have been more gradual than many had expected. Asecurity associations, such as CERT.
look at some of the trends that have been developingEncouraged by President Clinton's Presidential Decision
over the years since September 11th reveals signs ofDirective (PDD) 63 on critical infrastructure protection,
change for the better--although the need for moreISACs first started forming a couple of years before 9
information security advancement is abundantly clear.11; the Bush administration has continued to support the
The morning of September 11th, 2001 started like anyformation of ISACs to cooperate with the PCIPB and
other for employees of the law firm Turner &DHS.
Owen, located on the 21st floor of One Liberty PlazaISACs exist for most major industries including the
directly across the street from the North World TradeIT-ISAC ( for information technology, the FS-ISAC ( for
Center Tower. Then everyone heard a huge explosionfinancial institutions as well as the World Wide ISAC (
and their building shook as if in an earthquake. Debrisfor all industries worldwide. The membership of ISACs
rained from the sky.have grown rapidly in the last couple of years as
Not knowing what was happening, they immediatelymany organizations recognize that participation in an
left the building in an orderly fashion--thanks toISAC helps fulfill their due care obligations to protect
systematic practice of evacuation drills--takingcritical information.
whatever files they could on the way out. File cabinetsA major lesson learned from 9/11 is that business
and computer systems all had to be left behind. In thecontinuity and disaster recovery (BC/DR) plans need
disaster that ensued, One Liberty Plaza was wreckedto be robust and tested often. "Business continuity
and leaning with the top ten floors twisted--the officesplanning has gone from being a discretionary item that
of Turner & Owen were decimated.keeps auditors happy to something that boards of
Although Turner & Owen IT staff made regulardirectors must seriously consider," said Richard Luongo,
backup tapes of their computer systems, those tapesDirector of PricewaterhouseCoopers' Global Risk
had been sent to a division of the company located inManagement Solutions, shortly after the attacks. BC
the South World Trade Center Tower and they wereDR has proven its return on investment and most
completely lost when the South Tower wasorganizations have focused great attention on ensuring
destroyed. Knowing they had to recover their casethat their business and information is recoverable in the
databases or likely go out of business, Frank Turnerevent of a disaster.
and Ed Owen risked their lives and crawled throughThere also has been a growing emphasis on risk
the structurally-unstable One Liberty Plaza andmanagement solutions and how they can be applied to
retrieved two file servers with their most criticalROI and budgeting requirements for businesses. More
records. With this information, the law firm of Owenconference sessions, books, articles, and products on
& Turner was able to resume work less than tworisk management exist than ever before. While some
weeks later.of the growth in this area can be attributed to
Many other companies were never able to recoverlegislation like HIPAA, GLBA, Sarbanes Oxley, Basel II,
the information lost in this disaster.etc., 9/11 did a lot to make people start thinking about
What Has Changed?threats and vulnerabilities as components of risk and
One might think that years after such a devastatingwhat must be done to manage that risk.
loss of lives, property and information there would beTechnology Trends
dramatic differences and improvements in the wayMost companies realized the need to monitor their
businesses strive to protect their employees, assets,networks 24x7 prior to 9/11, but afterwards it became
and data. However, changes have been more graduala top priority if such a capability wasn't already in place.
than many had expected. "Some organizations thatMore and more companies are implementing intrusion
should have received a wakeup call seemed to havedetection systems (IDS) including network intrusion
ignored the message," says one information securitydetection systems (NIDS) and host intrusion detection
professional who prefers to remain anonymous.systems (HIDS) solutions. According to a 2003 Global
A look at some of the trends that have beenSecurity Survey by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, 85
developing over the years since September 11thpercent of respondents have deployed intrusion
reveals signs of change for the better--although thedetection systems. Since these systems can entail
need for more information security advancement islarge expenses of equipment and software purchases,
abundantly clear.consulting fees and staff time, some companies are
Federal Trendsturning to managed security service providers
The most noticeable changes in information security(MSSPs) to manage their network monitoring. Some
since September 11th, 2001 happened at the federalMSSPs also offer their clients advance notice of
government level. An assortment of Executive Orders,threats that the MSSP may have identified while
acts, strategies and new departments, divisions, andmonitoring other networks.
directorates has focused on protecting America'sLargely due to rampaging worms and viruses such as
infrastructure with a heavy emphasis on informationSlammer, patch management, change management
protection.and configuration management technology solutions
Just one month after 9/11, President Bush signedhave been raised in precedence within corporate risk
Executive Order 13231 "Critical Infrastructure Protectionmanagement initiatives. A slew of applications and
in the Information Age" which established thetools exist to address the needs of patch, change, and
President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Boardconfiguration management, but the challenge is to find
(PCIPB). In July 2002, President Bush released thethe right combination of tools that will do the job in any
National Strategy for Homeland Security that called forgiven environment.
the creation of the Department of Homeland SecurityInformation security staffs don't have time to sift
(DHS), which would lead initiatives to prevent, detect,through the growing multitude of threat warnings and
and respond to attacks of chemical, biological,vulnerability alerts that crop up for all possible platform
radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons. Thecombinations every day. So another information
Homeland Security Act, signed into law in Novembersecurity technology trend that has developed is
2002, made the DHS a reality.intelligent threat analysis--a service that provides threat
In February 2003, Tom Ridge, Secretary of Homelandand vulnerability alerts customized to a client's specific
Security released two strategies: "The Nationalenvironment.
Strategy to Secure Cyberspace," which was designedWhat Still Needs to Change
to "engage and empower Americans to secure theThe information security changes in government,
portions of cyberspace that they own, operate, control,industry, and technology are notable, but where do we
or with which they interact" and the "The Nationalstill need to improve in these areas?
Strategy for the Physical Protection of CriticalIf our government is serious about protecting critical
Infrastructures and Key Assets" which "outlines theinformation it will have to pass some sensible laws,
guiding principles that will underpin our efforts to securecontend information security experts. "Make
the infrastructures and assets vital to our nationalcompanies liable for insecurities, and you'll be surprised
security, governance, public health and safety,how quickly things get more secure," says Bruce
economy and public confidence".Schneier, Founder and CTO of Counterpane Internet
Additionally, under the Department of HomelandSecurity, Inc.
Security's Information Analysis and InfrastructureInformation security managers need to do a better job
Protection (IAIP) Directorate, the Critical Infrastructureof conveying how a company needs to protect its
Assurance Office (CIAO), and the National Cyberinformation to their CEOs and boards of directors.
Security Division (NCSD) were created. One of the topSiebel Systems CIO Mark Sunday says that although
priorities of the NCSD was to create a consolidatedcorporate boards are more aware of security issues
Cyber Security Tracking, Analysis and Responsethan ever, they still don't fully understand them--and
Center following through on a key recommendation ofmost boards don't like to fund things they don't
the National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace.understand. "As aware as CEOs and boards have
With all this activity in the federal government relatedbecome of security issues, spending in that area hasn't
to securing infrastructures including key informationgone up in proportion and certainly not to the levels
systems, one might think there would be a noticablepeople expected," Sunday said.
impact on information security practices in the privateAdvanced information security technology exists that
sector. But response to the National Strategy toisn't widely known or used by the mainstream. "Our
Secure Cyberspace in particular has been tepid, withtechnology is too signature-based," says Jim Reavis,
criticisms centering on its lack of regulations, incentives,editor of CSOinformer and information security
funding and enforcement. The sentiment amongindustry analyst. "We're only prepared to fight the last
information security professionals seems to be thatbattle. We need to get more predictive. We need to
without strong information security laws and leadershipuse more behavioral technology."
at the federal level, practices to protect our nation'sConclusion
critical information, in the private sector at least, will notIn a survey conducted jointly by the Internet Security
significantly change for the better.Alliance (ISAlliance), the National Association of
Industry TrendsManufacturers (NAM) and RedSiren Technologies Inc.
One trend that appears to be gaining ground in theone year after September 11th, 2001, 40 percent of
private sector, though, is the increased emphasis onrespondents reported that information security was
the need to share security-related information amongconsidered more important than prior to September
other companies and organizations yet do it in an11th. Yet almost one-third said their companies were still
anonymous way. To do this, an organization cannot adequately equipped to deal with an attack on their
participate in one of dozen or so industry-specificcomputer networks. The survey concluded that "many
Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (ISACs).organizations need to revise how security risks, threats
ISACs gather alerts and perform analyses andand costs are identified, measured and managed."
notification of both physical and cyber threats,Is our information more secure two years after
vulnerabilities, and warnings. They alert public andSeptember 11th? Unfortunately, not by a lot. While
private sectors of security information necessary tosome trends since 9/11 demonstrate progress in the
protect critical information technology infrastructures,field of information protection, opportunities for better
businesses, and individuals. ISAC members also haveinformation security practices clearly remain.